In a landmark legal move that could reshape the relationship between Hollywood and artificial intelligence, Disney and Universal have filed a joint lawsuit against Midjourney, a popular AI image generator, for allegedly infringing on their copyrighted characters. This marks the first major copyright lawsuit from Hollywood giants targeting an AI company and is poised to be a turning point in the legal battles surrounding generative AI technologies.
The Allegations: A “Virtual Vending Machine” of Plagiarism
The complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, accuses Midjourney of generating and distributing unauthorized images of iconic characters from Disney and Universal’s vast catalog. According to the lawsuit, Midjourney functions like a “virtual vending machine,” instantly producing high-quality, detailed images of characters such as Darth Vader, Buzz Lightyear, Shrek, Minions, Elsa, and Iron Man when prompted by users.
Disney and Universal argue that Midjourney has done so without permission or compensation, calling the company a “bottomless pit of plagiarism” and a “copyright free-rider.” The studios claim that this unauthorized use of their intellectual property blatantly violates copyright laws, emphasizing, “This case is not a ‘close call’ under well-settled copyright law. That is textbook copyright infringement.”
Characters Involved: From Star Wars to Shrek
The lawsuit outlines numerous examples of copyrighted characters allegedly generated by Midjourney’s AI, including but not limited to:
- Star Wars icons: Darth Vader, Yoda, R2-D2, Chewbacca, C-3PO, and Stormtroopers
- Marvel characters: Iron Man, Spider-Man, Deadpool, and the Guardians of the Galaxy
- Animated figures: Elsa (Frozen), WALL-E, Lightning McQueen (Cars), Buzz Lightyear (Toy Story), and the Minions (Despicable Me)
- Classic favorites: Aladdin and Shrek
The studios argue that Midjourney subscribers can produce these images on demand, and the platform provides these outputs without investing any creative effort, licensing, or acknowledgment of the original rights holders.
Hollywood’s First Major Copyright Lawsuit Against AI
This lawsuit marks the first time that major movie studios have formally challenged an AI company over content generation. While other creative industries—such as publishing and music—have already launched several lawsuits against AI companies, this move from Disney and Universal sets a new precedent for the film and entertainment world.
“Creativity is the cornerstone of our business,” said Kimberley Harris, Executive Vice President and General Counsel of NBCUniversal. “We are bringing this action today to protect the hard work of all the artists whose work entertains and inspires us and the significant investment we make in our content.”
Horacio Gutierrez, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer at The Walt Disney Company, added, “We are optimistic about how AI can be used responsibly to support human creativity. But piracy is piracy—whether it’s done by a person or a machine.”
Prior Warnings and Midjourney’s Response
According to the lawsuit, both studios sent formal cease-and-desist letters to Midjourney’s legal counsel, demanding the company stop generating and distributing copyrighted content. The letters went unanswered, and Midjourney allegedly continued updating and releasing new versions of its AI generator.
The studios highlight this lack of response as further proof of Midjourney’s “calculated and willful” disregard for copyright law. The complaint also notes that despite being aware of the issue, Midjourney prioritized its bottom line—raking in over $300 million in revenue last year—over legal compliance.
A Jury Trial and a Broader Industry Reckoning
Disney and Universal are calling for a jury trial to determine liability and potential damages. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications not only for Midjourney but also for other AI platforms that generate content using data scraped from copyrighted sources.
This lawsuit joins a growing wave of legal actions in the creative industry. Other AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are already facing litigation from authors, musicians, and news organizations. For example, The New York Times is currently suing OpenAI for allegedly using its articles to train large language models, and Universal Music has filed similar claims against Anthropic.
What This Means for AI and Creative Ownership
As generative AI continues to evolve, legal systems worldwide are grappling with how to protect intellectual property in a world where machines can replicate creative works in seconds. The lawsuit by Disney and Universal reflects broader concerns across media, publishing, and entertainment: how to ensure fair use and uphold copyright protections in the age of AI.
The case underscores a crucial message—innovation cannot come at the expense of creators’ rights.
