The deadly doll with sass is back—but is she still that B? “M3GAN 2.0” takes a sharp turn from the cheeky horror-comedy charm of its 2023 predecessor and attempts to up the stakes with military-grade threats, convoluted espionage, and some surprisingly serious commentary on artificial intelligence. While the sequel brings back fan favorites and adds sleek upgrades, it often forgets what made the original so much fun.
From Killer Companion to AI Avenger
In the first M3GAN, the titular android was a satirical horror icon—a robotic babysitter gone rogue, protecting a grieving child with murderous flair. The viral dancing, snarky comebacks, and sheer unpredictability made her a pop culture sensation. But M3GAN 2.0 dials down the kitsch and tries to elevate her into a full-blown action hero. This time, she’s fighting a new threat: an upgraded android named AMELIA, built as a U.S. military weapon and designed for infiltration, logistics, and destruction.
AMELIA—Autonomous Military Engagement Logistics and Infiltration Android—makes her grand entrance by wiping out an entire research facility during a mission near the Turkish-Iranian border. She’s a cold, highly advanced killing machine born from M3GAN’s own code, but stripped of humor or empathy.
Gemma’s Redemption Arc and the Rise of AMELIA
Allison Williams reprises her role as Gemma, the roboticist who created M3GAN. Wracked with guilt over the events of the first film, Gemma has been on a public apology tour, written a book on AI moderation, and joined the Center for Safe Technology. But her peaceful existence doesn’t last. When she learns AMELIA is loose and dangerous, and that M3GAN’s code is still alive, Gemma makes a choice: resurrect her creation to stop the bigger threat.
Gemma initially installs M3GAN into a stubby prototype body that’s mocked as a “Teletubby,” but the real M3GAN soon returns—complete with upgrades, killer fashion, and her signature voice (provided again by Jenna Davis). She’s still got the sass and wit, but now she’s more talkative than ever, practically human in both demeanor and presence.
A Tangle of Plots (and Subplots)
Director Gerard Johnstone, returning to helm and write the sequel, clearly aims for a “Terminator 2” level-up. But in trying to go bigger, he also goes messier. The plot spirals into multiple threads: Gemma’s development of an AI-free robotic exosuit, the corporate espionage of sleazy tech billionaire Alton Appleton (Jemaine Clement), the shady ambitions of new character Christian (Aristotle Athani), and the mysterious reactivation of a 1984 robot relic dubbed Project Black Box.
There’s also a subplot involving Cady (Violet McGraw), now 12, who’s caught between her rebellious teen phase and her bond with M3GAN. Cady hides her own robotic experiments from Gemma, whose overprotective stance has deepened since the original disaster. Unfortunately, Cady gets sidelined for much of the movie, with the focus shifting heavily toward military conspiracies and AI warfare.
Humor vs. Heaviness: A Delicate Balance That Falters
What made M3GAN a standout was its balance between eerie horror and laugh-out-loud absurdity. M3GAN 2.0 tries to keep some of that charm alive—there are hilarious moments, such as a Kate Bush-inspired ballad or a tech convention infiltration where M3GAN dons anime drag. And yes, she does bust out a dance move or two.
However, those bursts of campy brilliance feel isolated in a sea of self-serious plotting. AMELIA, while visually impressive and portrayed with icy menace by Ivanna Sakhno, lacks the layered charisma of M3GAN. Her scenes, though filled with spider-like wall-scrambling and decapitations, feel more like standard action filler than inventive horror.
Even M3GAN herself starts developing empathy and a moral compass—a creative choice that makes narrative sense, but drains some of her edge. Her transformation from killer doll to thoughtful protector may add depth, but it also softens the franchise’s core appeal.
Visuals Shine, Suspense Wanes
The film is sleek and stylish, thanks in part to cinematographer Toby Oliver (Get Out), who brings a polished sheen to the AI conventions, tech labs, and battlefield sequences. But the action scenes often lack tension. While Amelia dazzles with acrobatics and precision strikes, the stakes feel muddled amid the overcrowded plot.
The climax, involving mind control chips, betrayals, and a showdown laced with Steven Seagal references, should feel wild and electric. Instead, it’s overextended and predictable, missing the sharp pacing of the first film’s final act.
Verdict: A Glitchy but Entertaining Upgrade
M3GAN 2.0 is far from a failure. It’s entertaining in bursts, with returning cast members delivering solid performances, and M3GAN herself remaining a fascinating, snark-laced icon. But it’s also a cautionary tale in overcomplication. By packing in too many subplots, sidelining its most compelling characters at times, and leaning harder on spectacle than scares, the sequel loses the quirky, killer charm that made the original a hit.
Still, there’s hope. M3GAN remains a standout figure in the growing pantheon of AI-driven genre icons. If the inevitable M3GAN 3.0 returns with tighter writing, bolder horror, and unfiltered camp, this franchise could very well dance its way back into horror-comedy greatness.
Final Thoughts:
M3GAN 2.0 tries to be smarter, deeper, and bigger—but sometimes, all you really want is to watch a killer doll slay with sass.
Also Read: Brad Pitt’s ‘F1: The Movie’ Review: A High-Speed Spectacle That Shines More in Style Than Substance
