While the temptation is strong to resort to the iconic line “Sometimes dead is better” to describe “Pet Sematary: Bloodlines,” it might be a tad too cliché for this iteration. Venturing back to Ludlow, Maine in 1969, this prequel’s attempt at revitalizing the lore seems to be reaching into the past but with a questionable grasp.
“Bloodlines” predominantly focuses on Jud, a young man with dreams beyond Ludlow. On the cusp of a new chapter with his girlfriend Norma, a tragic twist halts their escape. The movie slightly tingles the spine with its portrayal of Timmy, reminiscent of the unsettling “Hitchhiker” from “The Texas Chain Saw Massacre.” But, this slight nod feels lost as the character transforms into what seems like a cliché horror antagonist, attributed to possession but feels more like an incomplete performance.
Star power in the form of David Duchovny and Pam Grier falls flat, becoming mere shadows amidst the overarching curse. The film’s silver lining is the noteworthy performance of Forrest Goodluck, bringing depth and nuance to his role.
However, what truly mars “Bloodlines” is its cinematography and editing. While Lindsey Anderson Beer might have charmed audiences with “Sierra Burgess is a Loser,” her debut in the horror genre lacks the suspense and pacing to elevate the narrative. Poorly timed jump scares leave audiences yawning, occasionally jolted awake by flashes of gore.
Amid the murky depths of the screenplay, a glimmer of innovation surfaces in a flashback to 1674 Ludlow. Intriguingly, this brief sojourn into the past overshadows the main story, hinting at a more profound narrative. One can’t help but wish this segment was resurrected and further explored.
In conclusion, “Pet Sematary: Bloodlines” is an attempt at diving back into a familiar lore, but with questionable success. While there are some redeeming moments and performances, it may not be enough to revive the franchise’s magic fully.
Also Read: Cyberpunk 2077 Will Be Adapted into a Live-Action Version
